Jump to content

Amira

User
  • Content Count

    1,826
  • Joined

  • Last visited

3 Followers

About Amira

  • Birthday 09/11/1998

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Profile Fields

  • Skill Points
    5

Recent Profile Visitors

72,010 profile views

Single Status Update

See all updates by Amira

  1. So staff can't retroactively enforce rules, except for when it benefits them in some way? Tristans actions in gaining those items and distributing them was not, in fact, against the rules. So please dont try to say that because it just makes you look like a hypocrite.

    A true compromise leaves niether side happy, and having other players create vanity items to replace those items is unacceptable. That replacement "Blackfyre Cloak" was not Zelrius' cloak that he had in character. Neither would this vanity Commandants Pendant be. By replacing them with these fakes you would be taking Tristan's characters actions and making them completely out of character. His charcater doesnt seem like the sort to get fakes made of a friends items to give to others. Just making that side point.

    Once again, retroactively enforcing a rule isnt something that staff should be able to do. And if they can, this isnt a place i'd want to be. If I wasnt trying so hard to point out the contradictory actions of the staff, or to make this point, i would suggest that only the items that the deceased had on would vanish. (Which would include the pendant) However, that would still require them to retroactively enforce a rule that they came up with quite a while after the fact.

     

    Before anyone tries to say that this is just me trying to get a unique item, no matter the decision of staff, i wont be keeping the pendant.  Obviously if staff decides to continue retroactively enforcing this rule, i wont get it. But if they stop and I get it, ill be giving it away in order to keep people from trying to invalidate my argument by saying it's "greed".   

    P.S. I fully expect a reply here giving me an official warning, this status to be locked, and maybe even deleted. If so it will just prove to me that staff knows that what their doing is wrong and against their own rules and is choosing to ignore that.

    P.P.S. That isnt a threat, just the statement of a fact.

    1. Show previous comments  2 more
    2. Baldur

      Baldur

      You are exactly right Manta. Staff shouldn't be allowed to retroactively enforce rules.

      That's why Tristan was denied the items.

    3. Amira

      Amira

      I dont agree with that Baldur. That makes no sense at all. While they might not be retroactively enforcing rules, they werent denied because staff wasnt retroactively enforcing rules.

      Anyways, meant to post this last night. I retract my statements about the staff retroactively enforcing so they lose the items. Not the part about how staff shouldnt retroactively enforce things. But that isnt an issue any longer.

      I was both misinformed and uninformed about the reasonings used to deny the trades of the items, so a big thanks to Lycan ^ for explaining that to me. I'm sure there were others who thought similarly and just werent saying anything, and if that is the case I would point you to his reply above as it really clears things up.

       

    4. Shark

      Shark

      See... if you don't understand or don't agree with a choice the staff has made, just ask the GM Rep (Lycan). He most likely has the reasoning xD ;)

×
×
  • Create New...