Jump to content

Life

User
  • Content Count

    1,542
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

About Life

  • Birthday 01/30/1998

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Everywhere and nowhere
  • Interests
    Poetry/Literature/Music/Armour/Technology/Martial Arts

    Martial Arts: Kyokushin Karate, Hapkido, Japanese Juijitsu

Profile Fields

  • Skill Points
    69

Recent Profile Visitors

24,406 profile views
  1. Life

    The Name Is Life

    Yea I remember most of the people here. Good to see you still dude
  2. Life

    The Name Is Life

    Nevermind I'm making my own Rpg with strippers and blackjack
  3. Life

    The Name Is Life

    Just wanted to announce my formal return to SAO-RPG. It's been a long time and I look forward to seeing how far everyone has come since I've been gone.
  4. Yo how do you play this game xd

    1. Show previous comments  2 more
    2. Life

      Life

      Seriously how do i play someone help this account didn't come with instructions when i bought it off ebay xd

    3. Baldur

      Baldur

      You gotta get a job, and a house, and you spin to see how many spaces you move down the road of life. Oh Did you mean sao? ;)

    4. Hirru

      Hirru

      You get a Profession, get a 'house', and you roll to see how much you missed the target.  Oh, you mean helpful guide?

  5. Gah, so many memories.

    1. Hirru

      Hirru

      Life returns to the masses, and all rejoice in undead reverie.

    2. Hikoru

      Hikoru

      LIFE-SENPAI, YOU'VE RETURNED!

    3. Helios
  6. Azide

    Hope life's treating you well. Happy birthday!

    1. Mack

      Mack

      Happy Birfday Life!

  7. Medium and Hard RGQs now give more sp

    1. Show previous comments  3 more
    2. Baldur

      Baldur

      I don't see why not.

      Take for a grain of salt I'm not staff, but the (6 total) etc... comments were Life's way of making it easier to calculate total SP. So yes, you still get the +1 SP per page, he just forgot to include that change in his revision.

    3. Life

      Life

      What baldur said,ty for remind me. The idea is to make the rewards at least on par with the easy rewards

    4. Life

      Life

      Yes RGQ's are open. I believe they were locked by mistake.

  8. Grave

    About RGQs:
    'at least 5 'floor levels' above their highest level player'
    '
    materials required is 1 + floor level divided by 5 rounded down'
    What is meant by 'floor level' in both of these cases?

    1. Ariel - The Crowned Lion

      Ariel - The Crowned Lion

      for example, a player is level 25.. then he need to kill at least 5 mobs of floor 30 strength mobs like you'd find on a dungeon at floor 30 : 

      floor strength mobs:   (Floor Level x 4 Health, Floor Level x 3 Damage), mitigation that is at least 1/4 of the mobs HP 

      loot mobs:   (Floor Level x 4 Health, Floor Level x 3 Damage), mitigation that is at least 1/4 of the mobs HP and at least half the health of the highest player in the thread.

      so a group with a player with max. level = 25 would need to fight 5 mobs with the following stats:

      Health: 120 [(25+5)x4]
      Damage: 90 [(25+5)x3]
      Mitigation: 30 [120/4]

      if the mob's health is least half the health of the level 25 player, then he's also a loot mob.

       

      Hope that cleared it out. If I'm wrong then a GM will correct me.

    2. Grave

      Grave

      Don't worry, Zaz cleared this up for me last night :D Thanks!

  9. Life

    The Decision Committee

    I'm sorry @Lycan but there is nothing on that list that hasn't already been discussed or thought over by staff. The committee is redundant and does not speak for the whole community. New players shouldn't be told that other players know what they want and whats best for them. Once you get into that territory of changing things based on how you think things should be, it enters GM territory. Players have been able to express their opinions and suggestions since forever, instead of having a committee perhaps we should start taking them more seriously and start being a little more transparent with what we do/are doing on staff. While I'm not against there being community reps for players to go to for help, that shouldn't mean that they have the same level of power or authority as staff. Not to mention that the community reps might also not have all the answers, and will not always know the correct rulings. You don't solve issues and rumors of abuse of power by creating another power to be abused, if you have issues with a staff member then contact one of the Admins about it. A lot of the things also being discussed by the committee have already been decided on as well long ago by staff such as a 'starter pack', the issue isn't giving new players freebies to catch up, its the discrepancy between the higher and lower levels. No one likes being the newbie, but we all went through it. That's not to say there wont be help for the lower level players in future, but the idea is for them to earn their position and levels, not be handed it. These issues are sensitive and bringing them into the public may cause a lot of drama and unnecessary conflict. Once again I will say that at no point has there never been a time where a player couldn't voice their opinion or reach out to a staff member for something. Over the course of all the drama I have never received a single message of concern about anything relating to the site or its people. Even if a staff member is not online, it shouldn't stop you from asking them questions. We don't need divisions in our community, we need a unity and a single authority to decide on matters by the community. Furthermore, the committee and staff may have conflicting views and ideas, and again, the committee doesn't always speak for the whole community. While the committee discuss things in their own chat, the whole staff will never know what is being talked about in that chat, only the 3 staff members on it. No one GM should also have a bigger say than another, and no pst a bigger say than another. I personally find it insulting that three members of staff are talking about things that have a real impact on the site without the whole staffs full knowledge. How can we be expected to function as a team when there are discussions being held that exclude members of the team? And it also isn't fair to the community reps that because of this other staff members are going to be more inclined to reject their ideas, thus wasting their efforts. Perhaps not all things mentioned are the case. But they are all very possible depending on the case. The committee is flawed, and again, redundant. If I offended anyone I apologize in advance. However I ask you to consider this from a new perspective.
  10. Teen drinking! Is very, very, bad!

    Yo i got a fake ID tho~

  11. Reading Azides last few posts left me speechless. Painful to see him go..

    1. Show previous comments  8 more
    2. Macradon

      Macradon

      That's what I said

    3. Hirru

      Hirru

      Sorry, just got back from work, and I'm rather tired.

    4. Macradon
  12. Bumping this because i think its very useful
  13. Stonewall has been nerfed.

  14. Reveal has been updated.

×